- #DIGITAL PERFORMER VS CUBASE FOR FREE#
- #DIGITAL PERFORMER VS CUBASE UPDATE#
- #DIGITAL PERFORMER VS CUBASE SOFTWARE#
- #DIGITAL PERFORMER VS CUBASE MAC#
Nuendo's ADR taker can be used for this, without a few conveniences of DP's approach.Ĩ- DP only supports Eucon on Mac currently. Just too hard on the eyes for long periods of time.ħ - DP has streamers and punches setup for composing - very useful and easy to setup. This was ultimately the deciding point for me. But you could use a 3rd party macro system with DP or any DAW.Ħ - DP's controller graphics and text are tiny. DP's key command set is extensive (as is Cubase's). DP has some powerful tools for manipulating data though. You can select, duplicate, etc in DP, but it's worth trying out to see how well you can get used to the differences.ĥ - Key Editors - Cubase has key commands to recall controller views. Editing in DP means getting used to using the range tool instead of just grabbing clips, dragging ends, cut/paste, etc. DP requires a track per articulation - much larger templates, more tracks to scroll through, but you can always setup folders to simplify this.Ĥ - Editing in DP is track-based. It can be a challenge dealing with multiple cues and tempo changes in a single Cubase project (so I rarely do).ģ - Cubase has expression maps - great for streamlining templates and editing keyswitch uses. Great of course for setting up cues at different timecodes and tempi in a single project. One could always setup an MTC slave to run video though.Ģ - DP has chunks, Cubase doesn't. DP (Windows only) seems to be more suited for game-oriented graphics cards, otherwise cpu usage with video is very high. DP uses it's own video engine Cubase/Nuendo use Quicktime.
Here are some of my personal comparison thoughts (but by no means an exhaustive comparison):įirst, both are powerful DAWs in their own right, but as others noted, they have rather different approaches.ġ - On Windows, DP's video support is far less consistent than Cubase/Nuendo. I've had DP 8 for a while and spent some time with it, including setting up my template and writing a few cues in it.
#DIGITAL PERFORMER VS CUBASE SOFTWARE#
There is overture, which in the newest edition is trying to merge the best capabilities of a DAW in terms of midi editing, with the notational capabilities of notation software – but it is still early in the process of development – so we’ll see where it goes.I have been comparing the two somewhat extensively the past few weeks as I was considering moving to DP for a project where chunks would be of great benefit. My method generally revolves around composing outside of the DAW, either on paper, or in Sibelius, and then taking the parts and performing them into the DAW. I like working in Digital Performer, but like any DAW, I view them as the place where the performance takes place. Protools is more geared towards audio engineers than composers, but some composers use it as well for the composition side of things – although I’ve heard the midi capabilities are not as strong as other DAWs. It also has a scripting engine, so people write extensions for it, that may be useful for you.
#DIGITAL PERFORMER VS CUBASE FOR FREE#
Reaper is a good choice as well – because it is relatively cheap, and you can use it for free indefinitely without buying the license.
#DIGITAL PERFORMER VS CUBASE UPDATE#
I would say Cubase is better than logic, and has better support – apple has been kind of slow to update logic. Many of my friends use logic, and cubase. I use Digital Performer, but it is definitely geared towards film composers and is on the more expensive side. It isn’t as powerful as other notation software packages.įor a DAW, they all have different strengths and weaknesses.
I haven’t been too impressed with Notion, but some people seem to really like it. I haven’t used finale, although I know some top orchestrators in hollywood that do, so I know it can do anything you need. You can use that, and then take the time to decide if you want Sibelius, or Dorico. Even though it’s free, it gives you very good notation. It will probably have fewer features at the beginning, but overtime, I think it will win out.įor the time being, musescore is a great choice. Right now, I think it is the best one out there, but the new notation software by Steinberg, called Dorico will be released this fall, and I believe it will be better than Sibelius.
0 kommentar(er)
